VIEW VIEWPOINT

Three Parents

Written by admin February 20 - 2015
If two is company, then certainly three parents are a crowd. That is how some are describing the decision by the British House of Commons that voted to legalize the creation of a baby using the DNA of three parents. The controversial practice is being touted as a way to create children without certain genetic diseases. But much more is going on behind the scenes. Remember what Dr. Frankenstein said before his fictional experiment? “What could possibly go wrong?” The scientific and ethical issues are significant, but that hasn’t stopped one American researcher from requesting permission from the FDA to conduct trials on similar experiments. Dr. Peter Saunders, a British opponent of the legislation, said, “These techniques are highly experimental, unproven, known to be unsafe, ineffective, costly, a waste of public money, insufficiently understood, and will require large numbers of efforts to proceed, even for just a few families.” I think that sums up many of the concerns. As I mentioned, the procedure was initially promoted as a way to create perfect children by preventing disease-causing mutations in their mitochondria. The argument by the British researchers and the American researcher is that a three-parent conception will create in vitro babies that are free of mitochondrial diseases. However, one scientist also wants to use the three-parent technique for the treatment of infertility. I think we can begin to see where this leads. First, we are creating babies without mitochondrial disease. Then we are using the technique to treat infertility. Along the road we begin to accept the idea of designer babies and even the creation of a super race. We have the technological ability to do some incredible things. Do we have the wisdom and moral foundation to make the right choices? Just because we can do something doesn’t always mean that we should do it. In the movie Jurassic Park, Ian Malcolm complains to the park’s creator that “your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn’t stop to think whether they should.” We don’t need to rush into a world of three-parent embryos. Viewpoints by Kerby Anderson http://ncfr.net/ncfr.net/subdomains/commentary/Downloads/Kerby_Anderson/02-20-2015.mp3

Viewpoints

View All
Texas childrens hospital houston
May 29, 2026
Penna Dexter

Stunning Reversal

Penna Dexter Two years ago, I complained that: “Radical transgender directives just keep coming from the executive branch of the federal government.” There’s been a stunning reversal. States fought ba...

Listen
Tv dinner and family on their devices
May 29, 2026
Kerby Anderson

TV Dinners to Smartphones

Kerby Anderson Columnist Bob Greene noticed a connection between TV Dinners and smartphones. In fact, he says the 1950s meal was a gateway drug for screen addiction. He believes that our zombie-like a...

Listen
Secret service surround shot president trump
May 28, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Political Fantasy

Kerby Anderson A recent poll of Americans conducted by NewsGuard and YouGov is disturbing on its face. It is even more concerning the deeper you delve into the data. The topline comment is that a siza...

Listen

Take Action

View All
Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

Support the SAVE Act
April 2, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.

Contact Congress About the Prevent Government Shutdowns Act of 2025
October 15, 2025

Contact Congress About the Prevent Government Shutdowns Act of 2025

Congress needs to get the job done, not run away from work.