VIEW VIEWPOINT

Marriage Decision

Written by admin November 17 - 2014
Federal judges have been striking down state marriage laws right and left, so it was encouraging to see one judge who understood his role in the judicial process and acknowledged judicial precedents. Judge Jeffrey Sutton wrote in his opinion for the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals that states have the right to define marriage, especially when the is based on basic biology and thousands of years of history and tradition. He wrote that marriage “has long been a social institution defined by relationships between men and women. So long defined, the tradition is measured in millennia, not centuries or decades.” You have to appreciate a judge who understands the importance of traditional marriage and its place in light of thousands of years of history and tradition. He went on to say: “Process and structure matter greatly in American government. Indeed, they may be the most reliable, liberty-assuring guarantees of our system of government requiring us to take seriously the route the United States Constitution contemplates for making such a fundamental change of such a fundamental social institution.” You also have to appreciate a judge who understands that a few unelected judges should not overturn laws governing marriage. This should be the action of legislatures or a state amendment process that reflects the will of the people. The judge also acknowledged earlier precedents for traditional marriage. Judge Sutton also noted that basic biology affirms traditional marriage (they complement each other). In a previous commentary about the book by Sean McDowell and John Stonestreet, I summarized their simple syllogism: sex makes babies; society needs babies, and babies deserve mothers and fathers. These three truths form the foundation for traditional marriage. Now that there are conflicting decisions from different appeals courts, it seems likely that the Supreme Court will step in to take a case involving the state amendments that were passed to define marriage. We can hope that the justices see the wisdom in the opinion by Judge Jeffrey Sutton. Viewpoints by Kerby Anderson http://ncfr.net/ncfr.net/subdomains/commentary/Downloads/Kerby_Anderson/11-17-2014.mp3

Viewpoints

View All
Texas childrens hospital houston
May 29, 2026
Penna Dexter

Stunning Reversal

Penna Dexter Two years ago, I complained that: “Radical transgender directives just keep coming from the executive branch of the federal government.” There’s been a stunning reversal. States fought ba...

Listen
Tv dinner and family on their devices
May 29, 2026
Kerby Anderson

TV Dinners to Smartphones

Kerby Anderson Columnist Bob Greene noticed a connection between TV Dinners and smartphones. In fact, he says the 1950s meal was a gateway drug for screen addiction. He believes that our zombie-like a...

Listen
Secret service surround shot president trump
May 28, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Political Fantasy

Kerby Anderson A recent poll of Americans conducted by NewsGuard and YouGov is disturbing on its face. It is even more concerning the deeper you delve into the data. The topline comment is that a siza...

Listen

Take Action

View All
Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

Support the SAVE Act
April 2, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.

Contact Congress About the Prevent Government Shutdowns Act of 2025
October 15, 2025

Contact Congress About the Prevent Government Shutdowns Act of 2025

Congress needs to get the job done, not run away from work.