VIEW VIEWPOINT

Undo Gender Blending

Written by Penna Dexter January 10 - 2025
Penna Dexternever miss viewpoints

Whenever there’s a new session of Congress, the House of Representatives adopts a new set of rules to govern the way it conducts business. Four years ago, then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi introduced, and the House passed, a resolution aimed at making all House rules “gender inclusive.”

The resolution expunged sex-specific words from House rules.

So where the terms “father” and “mother” had previously appeared in the House Code of Official Conduct, they were replaced with “parent.” “Husband” and “wife” became “spouse.” ”Son” and “daughter” became “child.” And “brother” and “sister”: ”sibling.”

It really gets awkward: “Aunt” and “uncle” were replaced with “parent’s sibling” and “cousin” became “sibling’s child.” For in-laws, the terms are “parent-in-law”, “child-in-law” and “sibling-in-law.” The absurd list goes on. There’s even a section that eliminates all gendered terms.

To be clear, these changes only affected the rules document and do not prevent the House members from using gendered language in floor speeches or legislation. But this hat tip to the far Left’s desire to eliminate every distinction between the sexes is silly and just makes it harder to communicate clearly.

This ridiculous action by the 117th Congress should have been reversed two years ago by the 118th Congress, But, with extended wrangling over who would be speaker, this crucial task was skipped

The Wall Street Journal recently published an op-ed by Washington attorney Eileen O’Connor calling on members to now complete what she calls “The House’s Unfinished Gender Business,” and restore the “pre-117th Congress’s language.”

That language, Ms. O’Connor argues, is the opposite of gender inclusive. “It denies the existence of the sexes and the words used to describe their relationships to each other.”

She writes, “When even elected officials can’t bring themselves to acknowledge the basic facts of life, it is no wonder the rest of society loses its nerve as well.” The House should restore clarity to its rules and eschew all gender-blending nonsense.penna's vp small

Listen to this Viewpoint

Viewpoints

View All
1789576878 6aaac6ae4fcf1
September 16, 2026
Author Alexander Campbell

test 1234

"Ipsum" redirects here. For the car, see Toyota Ipsum.Using Lorem ipsum to focus attention on graphic elements in a webpage design proposalAn example of the Lorem ipsum placeholder text on a Letraset...

Listen
Test View point SEp 15
September 15, 2026
Faiq Author Testing

Test View point SEp 15

Test

test home view
September 15, 2026
Faiq Author Testing

test home view

test

Take Action

View All
September 15, 2026

test home take

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

Support the SAVE Act
April 2, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.