VIEW VIEWPOINT

Funding Abortion

Written by Kerby Anderson August 3 - 2016
One of the more controversial planks in the Democratic Party platform is the call for the repeal of the Hyde Amendment so that there can be full taxpayer funding of abortion. This is a remarkable change from just four years ago. The Hyde Amendment is named for Representative Henry Hyde and prohibits the use of federal funds for abortion (except in cases of the mother’s life or rape or incest). It was passed by Congress in 1976 and signed into law by President Jimmy Carter in 1977. Even as recently as 2010 when Congress was debating the Affordable Care Act, President Obama did not call for the repeal of the Hyde Amendment. He even promised pro-life Democrats that the new law would not use federal funds for abortion. Apparently much has changed since then. The Democratic Party Platform this year says: “We will continue to oppose—and seek to overturn—federal and state laws and policies that impede a woman’s access to abortion, including repealing the Hyde Amendment.” More than six in ten (63%) Americans say they oppose taxpayer funding of abortion. This includes nearly half (45%) of pro-choice Americans and significant percentages of African-Americans (65%) as well as Hispanic-Americans (61%). This is not a popular stand with most Americans. Let’s be honest, in our pluralistic society all Americans can find something objectionable that the federal government funds with their tax dollars. Even though we don’t like how our money is used, we don’t allow a taxpayer veto of the use of their tax money. But we also recognize that abortion is a special case. The Supreme Court might have made abortion legal, but that does not mean that we should force all Americans to pay for the immoral act of abortion. I think it is highly unlikely that Congress will seriously consider repealing the Hyde Amendment any time soon. Nevertheless, this plank in the Democratic Party platform illustrates how radical Democrat Party leaders are and what they hope to someday accomplish in Congress. Viewpoints by Kerby Anderson

Listen to this Viewpoint

Viewpoints

View All
1789576878 6aaac6ae4fcf1
September 16, 2026
Author Alexander Campbell

test 1234

"Ipsum" redirects here. For the car, see Toyota Ipsum.Using Lorem ipsum to focus attention on graphic elements in a webpage design proposalAn example of the Lorem ipsum placeholder text on a Letraset...

Listen
Test View point SEp 15
September 15, 2026
Faiq Author Testing

Test View point SEp 15

Test

test home view
September 15, 2026
Faiq Author Testing

test home view

test

Take Action

View All
September 15, 2026

test home take

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

Support the SAVE Act
April 2, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.