Kerby Anderson

Current discussions on fixing food stamps focus on two separate issues. The House Agriculture Committee would like to save $230 billion over the next 10 years, and nearly half of that involves the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP).

This program was begun to provide temporary help for those who fall on hard times, but the attempt to provide a hand-up turned into a handout. More than 41 million Americans are on food stamps, including millions of adults who can work but aren’t working.

Years ago, the federal government mandated that adults who receive food stamps should work if they are able. Unfortunately, the states have obtained waivers. According to one estimate, nearly 40 percent of these able-bodied adults without dependents live in areas where the work requirement is waived.

Another issue is the fact that states manage the program, but the federal government provides all the benefits. The states thus have an incentive to draw more federal dollars. Congress obviously needs to make some changes to the program.

One last concern is the health of Americans on food stamps. As one commentator put it, the N in SNAP means nutrition. Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to “Make America Healthy Again.” Unfortunately, much of the food stamp benefits are spent on soda, candy, and snacks.

At least four governors in the states of Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, and West Viginia are seeking waivers from the federal government. They want to remove soda, candy, and other sweets from the food that can be purchased by SNAP funds.

Obesity is considered a healthcare crisis due to its significant impact on public health and the healthcare system. Federal funds should not be used to purchase food that lacks basic nutrition.