VIEW VIEWPOINT

COVID-Style Family Formation

Written by Kerby Anderson December 31 - 2021
Penna Dexternever miss viewpoints
New research on family life shows that COVID-19 has exacerbated a growing divide in family formation, with higher-income, better-educated Americans more interested in getting married and having children than those with less education and lower incomes. Marriage rates are falling. Birth and fertility rates are at record lows. The fertility rate is only about 1.7 children per woman. well below the replacement rate of 2.1 children per woman. All kinds of problems result from this decline in family formation, many of them economic. But New York Times columnist Ross Douthat says most research portends a “potentially disastrous long-term cost” for the poor and least-educated Americans for whom “singlehood and isolation define middle and old age.“ The pandemic contributed to these trends. Dating became more difficult when institutions where relationships often form — churches, colleges, and community organizations — closed or moved online. Ross Douthat warns that these institutions likely won’t resume the robust role they once played in matchmaking. Now, he writes, they’re “pushing people more and more into virtual spaces and virtual marriage markets that, on the evidence we have, aren’t doing a particularly good job of paring men and women off.” The pandemic fueled government “stimulus” spending that allowed many Americans to delay their return to work. This had the undesirable effect of encouraging more working-class men to drop out of the workforce. The research shows more women than men are now returning to church. But, more men than women are finding themselves in a lifestyle labeled NEET: Not in Education, Employment, or Training. And not getting married or starting families. There’s talk of a government-provided guaranteed income to relieve this downward pressure on the desire to form families. But would this alleviate what Ross Douthat described as the “family-unfriendliness” of men making low annual incomes? Would it change the minds of “more than half of single men making less than $50,000” per year who report they don’t want to have children? Probably not.penna's vp small

Listen to this Viewpoint

Viewpoints

View All
1789576878 6aaac6ae4fcf1
September 16, 2026
Author Alexander Campbell

test 1234

"Ipsum" redirects here. For the car, see Toyota Ipsum.Using Lorem ipsum to focus attention on graphic elements in a webpage design proposalAn example of the Lorem ipsum placeholder text on a Letraset...

Listen
Test View point SEp 15
September 15, 2026
Faiq Author Testing

Test View point SEp 15

Test

test home view
September 15, 2026
Faiq Author Testing

test home view

test

Take Action

View All
September 15, 2026

test home take

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

Support the SAVE Act
April 2, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.