VIEW VIEWPOINT

Climate Reparations

Written by Penna Dexter December 2 - 2022
Penna Dexternever miss viewpoints

Negotiators at the latest United Nations climate conference are touting a “breakthrough agreement” emanating from their recent gathering in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt. COS27 — the 27th UN climate conference — ended with commitments by the U.S. and other wealthy countries to compensate poor countries for the damage allegedly caused by climate change.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the rationale for setting up this “loss and damage” fund is that “industrialization has increased temperatures and led to natural disasters.” John Kerry, chief negotiator for the U.S., has said such transfers could run into the trillions of dollars. Yet President Biden signed us up.

As the Journal’s Gerard Baker explains, “The idea is that developing countries are being literally inundated with the costs of climate change in the form of rising sea levels, extreme weather, and other horsemen of the meteorological apocalypse.” This assumes that human-caused climate change is the cause of these disasters — a premise that’s far from settled.

In a column titled, “The West Made the World Prosperous and Now We Must Pay,” Gerard Baker argues against “the idea that the least developed countries in the world have received only the cost of industrialization and not its many benefits.” But advocates for climate justice insist that, because the U.S. became wealthy using fossil fuels, we must pay “climate reparations” to countries the UN defines as “developing.”

Poor nations suffer disproportionately from natural disasters because they are poor. In their quest to banish fossil fuels from the planet, UN climate warriors have been pushing for policies that would deny developing nations access to the cheap, reliable sources of energy they need for growth. Ten years ago, the U.N. established a fund to pay poor countries to forgo the use of fossil fuels. Rich countries are supposed to contribute $100 billion per year. Washington Post columnist Marc Theissen asks, “Why should American taxpayers pay developing countries not to develop?”

Climate reparations will never replace good economic policy.penna's vp small

Listen to this Viewpoint

Viewpoints

View All
1789576878 6aaac6ae4fcf1
September 16, 2026
Author Alexander Campbell

test 1234

"Ipsum" redirects here. For the car, see Toyota Ipsum.Using Lorem ipsum to focus attention on graphic elements in a webpage design proposalAn example of the Lorem ipsum placeholder text on a Letraset...

Listen
Test View point SEp 15
September 15, 2026
Faiq Author Testing

Test View point SEp 15

Test

test home view
September 15, 2026
Faiq Author Testing

test home view

test

Take Action

View All
September 15, 2026

test home take

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

Support the SAVE Act
April 2, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.