VIEW VIEWPOINT

Churches and Zoning

Written by Kerby Anderson January 7 - 2015
A case involving a church sign is headed to the Supreme Court. While that might seem like a trivial case, it illustrates what may become a major battleground between church and state. A small church in Arizona relies on temporary signs to direct worshipers to its services. This Presbyterian Church rents space in various places for its services. So they depend on putting up cardboard signs to direct people to the latest location. The town of Gilbert, Arizona restricts such signs, but does not appear to restrict other signs put up by politicians and even signs put up by the homeowner associations. One picture I saw showed one fence completely covered with campaign signs during the last election. In the background you can even see signs on other walls like “For Sale By Owner.” It is hard to believe that a temporary sign directing people to a worship service would have any negative effect on the aesthetics of the community. At stake is much more than aesthetics. The case raises this question: Does government have the right to censor the type of content citizens promote? This is not only a freedom of religion question: it’s a free speech question. And it raises questions about how zoning will affect churches in the future. On my radio program, I have suggested that future church-state battles won’t be over school prayer or the posting of the Ten Commandments as much as they will be battles between cities and churches over zoning. A church in Texas was told it could not hold services in their rented space because a local ordinance bans a church or a school from meeting on the property. A church in Georgia had to hold its services in the basement of a jewelry store because churches cannot meet on property of less than three acres. A church in Illinois could meet and pray on their property, just not on Sunday mornings. And they could not call their property a church. This growing list of restrictions may be why the Supreme Court decided to hear a church sign case. How these justices rule will impact lots of churches in America. Viewpoints by Kerby Anderson http://ncfr.net/ncfr.net/subdomains/commentary/Downloads/Kerby_Anderson/01-07-2015.mp3

Viewpoints

View All
1789576878 6aaac6ae4fcf1
September 16, 2026
Author Alexander Campbell

test 1234

"Ipsum" redirects here. For the car, see Toyota Ipsum.Using Lorem ipsum to focus attention on graphic elements in a webpage design proposalAn example of the Lorem ipsum placeholder text on a Letraset...

Listen
Test View point SEp 15
September 15, 2026
Faiq Author Testing

Test View point SEp 15

Test

test home view
September 15, 2026
Faiq Author Testing

test home view

test

Take Action

View All
September 15, 2026

test home take

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

Support the SAVE Act
April 2, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.