VIEW VIEWPOINT

Challenge the FCC

Written by Kerby Anderson March 11 - 2015
Now that the FCC has passed regulations concerning net neutrality, some are not only calling for Congress to challenge the regulations, they are calling for Congress to challenge the FCC itself. Tom Giovanetti of the Institute for Policy Innovation, for example, even says it is “Time for Congress to Gut the FCC.” Even if you don’t understand the concept of net neutrality you have to be concerned about the process by which the current FCC issued their regulations. We have now discovered that there were two sets of regulations. The FCC commissioners were working to develop a set of regulations on net neutrality that would have been moderate and a compromise between some of the strong positions taken by various interest groups. But while they were working on these regulations, the Wall Street Journal has now reported that there were a series of secret, parallel regulations developed at the White House that became the final regulations. That leads to a second concern. No public comment was allowed on those regulations for a very good reason. As I have reported in previous commentaries, nobody was allowed to see those regulations. This is not what we would expect from what was supposed to be the most transparent administration in history. These regulations will affect you and the Internet you use everyday. That is why the FCC should have made the process open and transparent. In fact, these sorts of regulations should be made through the legislative process not by a few bureaucrats appointed by the president. Tom Giovanetti argues that the FCC could be completely eliminated by distributing FCC responsibilities to other agencies like the Federal Trade Commission and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Many of these functions already overlap these and other agencies. Congress may not eliminate the FCC, but at least it should rein it in. Senator John Thune is pushing ahead with an investigation. He says, “The FCC’s direction is bad for the Internet and bad for consumers.” It is time for Congress to challenge the FCC. Viewpoints by Kerby Anderson http://ncfr.net/ncfr.net/subdomains/commentary/Downloads/Kerby_Anderson/03-11-2015.mp3

Viewpoints

View All
1789576878 6aaac6ae4fcf1
September 16, 2026
Author Alexander Campbell

test 1234

"Ipsum" redirects here. For the car, see Toyota Ipsum.Using Lorem ipsum to focus attention on graphic elements in a webpage design proposalAn example of the Lorem ipsum placeholder text on a Letraset...

Listen
Test View point SEp 15
September 15, 2026
Faiq Author Testing

Test View point SEp 15

Test

test home view
September 15, 2026
Faiq Author Testing

test home view

test

Take Action

View All
September 15, 2026

test home take

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

Support the SAVE Act
April 2, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.