VIEW VIEWPOINT

A Momentous Rewrite

Written by Kerby Anderson July 3 - 2020
Penna Dexternever miss viewpoints
The foundation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 lies in providing important political and economic protections for blacks. It’s a sweeping law. The Supreme Court tinkered with it recently and not in a good way. Title VII of the law provides powerful protections for women in the workplace. But the High Court’s 6-3 decision, in Bostock v. Clayton County, reinterpreted — really redefined — the phrase “on the basis of sex”, stuffinggender identity” and “sexual orientation’ into its meaning. Justice Neil Gorsuch, ironically a self-avowed textualist, wrote the opinion. In his dissent, Justice Samuel Alito called the ruling: “legislation” and pointed out that, “Over 100 federal statutes prohibit discrimination because of sex.” There could be some inconvenient repercussions: Religious business owners, concerned with damage to the face of their business will suffer. (The funeral home, the losing plaintiff in one of the cases bundled into Bostock, believed that the gender transition of its director would provide an unacceptable distraction to grieving families). Religious exemptions are not provided in this ruling. But even if they were, or are added in the future, they will likely not extend to business owners with religious convictions. (Baker Jack Phillips could be back in court.) People of faith in the helping professions — psychology, social work, medicine, etc. — could be obligated to affirm this definition of sex. Compliance could be a requirement for licensure. The Colson Center’s John Stonestreet expects the logic employed in the Bostock opinion to extend to other areas, like housing. He says, “the next domino will likely be Title IX, which prohibits sexual discrimination in education.” Christian schools and colleges that refuse to compromise would not survive. Certain athletic conferences already allow biological males who present as women to compete in women’s track, weightlifting, cycling, and other sports. If this reasoning is applied to Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, women’s sports, one of the law’s wonderful success stories, will be destroyed. Stay tuned. penna's vp small

Listen to this Viewpoint

Viewpoints

View All
Spy balloon
June 4, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Intelligence Gathering

Kerby AndersonOver the last month, we have been talking about China. When talking about China, we usually talk about its strengths and technological developments. But there is another side to intellig...

John adams quote our constitution was made
June 3, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Freedom’s Foundations

Kerby Anderson Freedom in this country depends upon three important foundations: morality, limits, and human rights. First, freedom depends on morality. John Adams observed, “Our constitution was made...

Hausers law in action 1946 2018
June 2, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Raise Tax Rates?

Kerby Anderson With estimates that the federal deficit will increase this year, we are once again hearing comments about making the “rich pay their fair share.” Even if we set aside the moral argument...

Take Action

View All
Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

Support the SAVE Act
April 2, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.

Contact Congress About the Prevent Government Shutdowns Act of 2025
October 15, 2025

Contact Congress About the Prevent Government Shutdowns Act of 2025

Congress needs to get the job done, not run away from work.