VIEW VIEWPOINT

A Momentous Rewrite

Written by Kerby Anderson July 3 - 2020
Penna Dexternever miss viewpoints
The foundation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 lies in providing important political and economic protections for blacks. It’s a sweeping law. The Supreme Court tinkered with it recently and not in a good way. Title VII of the law provides powerful protections for women in the workplace. But the High Court’s 6-3 decision, in Bostock v. Clayton County, reinterpreted — really redefined — the phrase “on the basis of sex”, stuffing “gender identity” and “sexual orientation’ into its meaning. Justice Neil Gorsuch, ironically a self-avowed textualist, wrote the opinion. In his dissent, Justice Samuel Alito called the ruling: “legislation” and pointed out that, “Over 100 federal statutes prohibit discrimination because of sex.” There could be some inconvenient repercussions: Religious business owners, concerned with damage to the face of their business will suffer. (The funeral home, the losing plaintiff in one of the cases bundled into Bostock, believed that the gender transition of its director would provide an unacceptable distraction to grieving families). Religious exemptions are not provided in this ruling. But even if they were, or are added in the future, they will likely not extend to business owners with religious convictions. (Baker Jack Phillips could be back in court.) People of faith in the helping professions — psychology, social work, medicine, etc. — could be obligated to affirm this definition of sex. Compliance could be a requirement for licensure. The Colson Center’s John Stonestreet expects the logic employed in the Bostock opinion to extend to other areas, like housing. He says, “the next domino will likely be Title IX, which prohibits sexual discrimination in education.” Christian schools and colleges that refuse to compromise would not survive. Certain athletic conferences already allow biological males who present as women to compete in women’s track, weightlifting, cycling, and other sports. If this reasoning is applied to Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, women’s sports, one of the law’s wonderful success stories, will be destroyed. Stay tuned. penna's vp small

Listen to this Viewpoint

Viewpoints

View All
1789576878 6aaac6ae4fcf1
September 16, 2026
Author Alexander Campbell

test 1234

"Ipsum" redirects here. For the car, see Toyota Ipsum.Using Lorem ipsum to focus attention on graphic elements in a webpage design proposalAn example of the Lorem ipsum placeholder text on a Letraset...

Listen
Test View point SEp 15
September 15, 2026
Faiq Author Testing

Test View point SEp 15

Test

test home view
September 15, 2026
Faiq Author Testing

test home view

test

Take Action

View All
September 15, 2026

test home take

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

Support the SAVE Act
April 2, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.